San Diego Animal Parks (7/14/03 - 7/15/03)
Last updated 7/20/03
Russian translation here
Of the three San Diego attractions that
have to do with animals -- the world-famous Zoo, Sea World, and the
Wild Animal Park -- I firmly prefer the latter. Sea World is good for
the rides and shows, of course, so it represents a slightly different
kind of entertainment, and we didn't go there this time in any case,
but I would advise everyone to visit the Wild Animal Park (WAP) over
the Zoo any day, the reasons being:
- Very few people, at least on
a Monday. The Zoo on a Tuesday was packed, and due to the nature of the
place, it's always chock full of kids. Not all kids behave. Not all
parents look after their children. WAP provides a much nicer
experience, especially if you go on (reasonably easy) walking trails
around the park where you barely meet any other people but get to
observe a lot of animals.
- "Wilder" atmosphere. The
Zoo, although it's well maintained and prefers to use the word
"exhibits" instead of "cages", is still a zoo: animals are confined to
small territory, constantly disturbed by unceremonious visitors, and
look quite unhappy with their fate in life. At WAP, on the other hand,
you get to see animals in their natural habitat or at least something
like it: antelopes walking across spacious plains, lions resting in the
shade by the hillside (not in a tiny doghouse). Of course areas are
still much more crowded with the animals than in nature, and Asian
species graze right next to African ones, but that's why you, the
visitor, actually get to see the beasts - in "real" nature they'd be
sparse and hard to find. WAP is probably about as close as you can get
to seeing animals in the wild without going to Africa for a safari...
- Fun and informative tour.
The tram tour at WAP is very well conducted; the tram comes close to
animal-inhabited areas and allows a view that isn't accessible by
walking trails, plus the narration is interesting and enlightening even
for someone like me (as a child I read every book on animals I could
get my hands on). The tour focuses a lot on reproductive behavior of
animals, probably due to the park's impressive success with breeding of
various endangered species and understandable pride in this
achievement. We got to hear about sex life of deer (females pick males
with most developed horns and bright skin coloring), giraffes (they
give birth standing up so the baby drops 8 feet to the ground), rhinos
(when a female chooses a potential mate, she breaks into a gallop and
runs for several days non-stop, with the male following her; if at the
end of the race the guy is still around, the female will consider
procreating with him)... lots of fun adult content. In contrast, the
tour at the Zoo had one and only highlight: double-decker bus. An
hour-long wait culminated in a half-hour ride around the park on the
same roads that you can walk, with commentary like "Here in this
exhibit we have an elephant... oh, you can't see it? Raise your hands
who can't see the elephant! That's okay, I can't see it either, it's
probably away hiding". You'll be better served by walking around on
your own.
Maybe I'm being too hard on the
Zoo here. As far as zoos go, San Diego has a great one. It's just that
I enjoyed the Wild Animal Park immensely more. Funny enough, it's a few
dollars cheaper, too!
Pictures
Note: pictures from the Zoo and
the Wild Animal Park got mixed up so in
most cases we can't tell which ones were taken where. Sorry about that!
The above are the only pictures
with people (that is, ourselves); the
rest below are purely animalistic.
Simians. The real
monkeys are on the other side of the
bars...
Hooved ones...
Birds and bees, uh,
butterflies.
The big guys:
elephant, warthog, giraffe, bear (lost the
picture!)